Sir Adrian Smith, President of the Royal Society, comments on election manifestos
Adrian Smith PRS, President of the Royal Society, discusses the parties’ stances on science and their plans for the next administration with less than two weeks till the general election.
Despite being central to the solutions to many of the big challenges we face, from low productivity and challenged public services through to climate change, science often barely gets a look-in during an election campaign. So, it was welcome to see science and the value it brings to our economy and society recognised in the parties’ manifestos.
Last week, we had the opportunity to question the parties further on how they would support science, innovation and technology, if they were elected, at a hustings hosted by the Royal Society in partnership with the Academy of Medical Sciences, the Royal Academy of Engineering, the British Academy, the Foundation for Science and Technology and the Campaign for Science and Engineering.
In our Manifesto for Science (PDF), we were clear that a new government must give an unambiguous commitment to sustained, long term public investment in scientific research. We were pleased to see these asks reflected in the parties’ manifestos. The Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats have committed to increase the levels of public investment in research and development, with the Lib Dems pledging to spend 3.5% of GDP on R&D by 2034 – reflecting our call to drive the G7 in R&D intensity.
Labour has restated its pledge for ten year budgets for key R&D institutions, an important signal of long term commitment, which would help to unlock growth and provide the certainty to attract researchers and private investors. Both Labour and the Conservatives have also pledged to support university spinouts, ensure start-ups have access to finance and funding for catapults.
A new government must be ambitious for science and commit to long term, sustained real terms public investment across our research system.
By investing in research, from university labs to routes to market, we can lead the way as a nation in turning early-stage discovery science into companies and products that can transform lives.
But if we want the UK to be home to the next generation of cutting-edge scientific discovery, innovation and technology, then we also need greater international collaboration. The next government should develop an international science strategy and remove barriers to bringing global scientific talent to the UK – including expensive upfront visa costs for international scientists. The UK already has visa costs up to 17 times higher than our international counterparts. This is damaging the UK’s competitiveness.
Slowing climate change and protecting our natural environment require urgent global action and must transcend party politics. Current commitments to reduce emissions under the Paris Agreement put us on a path to levels of warming above 2.9⁰C.
The parties have pledged to significantly increase renewable energy production, with investment in green hydrogen and carbon capture and storage. These cannot be empty promises and must be backed by an evidence-based technology roadmap on how to get there, led by the latest science. If we are to slow warming to 1.5 or 2⁰C, we need to act immediately and decisively. As the national academy for science, we stand ready to support the next government to accelerate decarbonisation of the economy, unlock green growth and hit our net zero targets.
Your article helped me a lot, is there any more related content? Thanks!